This way we avoid having to extract later, as we will never inline if the `isinst` argument if this could result in it being unrepresentable in C#.
This commit also refactors inlining restrictions to avoid requiring special cases in ILInlining itself.
But when making this change, I discovered that this broke our pattern-matching tests, and that the weird IL with double `isinst` is indeed generated by the C# compiler for `if (genericParam is StringComparison.Ordinal)` style code. So instead we also allow `isinst` with a `box(expr-without-side-effects)` argument to be represented with the `expr is T ? (T)expr : null` emulation.
Daniel Grunwald