The span and tuple tests need types the legacy reference mscorlib predates, so
each of them opened System.Runtime.dll from the ref-assembly toolset into its own
SimpleCompilation - five copies of the same block, five reads per test run. One
shared lazy compilation covers all of them, and it includes the test assembly so
the operator and extension-method fixtures the conversion tests rely on resolve.
Part of #829.
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5:Claude Code
The remaining parameter-modifier dimension of the C# 14 rules: an expanded
params call prefers the params ReadOnlySpan overload over params array (the
C# 13 better-params-collection rule) while the normal form keeps the exact
array overload; and a span conversion never binds a ref or out parameter,
so a keyword-less argument picks the by-value overload and the ref/out
keyword must survive decompilation to keep binding the by-ref one. All
expectations come from compiling probes (the negative directions are
CS1503) and everything was green as written - these are lock-downs, not
fixes.
Part of #829.
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5:Claude Code
Compiling probes with the C# 14 compiler establishes the matrix: a value
argument binds to an 'in ReadOnlySpan<T>' parameter with and without the
span conversion (a temporary is created), while an explicit 'in' argument
demands the parameter's own type (CS1503); and for a by-value/'in' overload
pair, a call without 'in' picks the by-value overload - also through the
span conversion - while 'in' at the call site makes the in-overload the
only candidate (CS1615 with a conversion).
The fixture pins the decompiler side of the same matrix: 'in' must survive
decompilation where it disambiguates the overload pair, and the folded
span-conversion argument must re-resolve to the by-value winner. The
resolver unit tests pin applicability and betterness directly. All of these
were green as written - they fence the implicit-in cast stripping and the
recheck ladder against regressions rather than fixing a defect.
Part of #829.
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5:Claude Code
Auditing against the first-class-span-types proposal turned up three
deviations, each now pinned by resolver unit tests whose expectations were
established by compiling probe programs with the C# 14 compiler.
Lower-bound type inference recursed into Span<T> targets as another
lower-bound inference, but Span<T> is invariant and the spec demands an
exact element inference there: M<T>(Span<T>, T) with (Span<string>, object)
must fail inference (CS0411), not unify to T=object.
Better-conversion-target compared ReadOnlySpan element types where the spec
compares the span types, admitting numeric and user-defined element
conversions the span types do not share: overloads taking ReadOnlySpan<int>
and ReadOnlySpan<long> are ambiguous (CS0121), not resolvable. The general
mutual-convertibility rule already implements the spec's span-type test, so
the element-level block is simply removed; the ReadOnlySpan-over-Span
identity rule stays, since it deliberately inverts that general rule.
The explicit span conversion did not exist at all, and with it the rule that
user-defined conversions are not considered between span-convertible types.
The visible consequence: string[] to Span<object> classified as an implicit
user-defined conversion via op_Implicit(object[]) plus array covariance,
where the compiler reports CS0266 - only the explicit span conversion
exists. Span conversions are also no longer considered for extension
receivers during method group conversion (CS0123), while invocations keep
them.
Part of #829.
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5:Claude Code
While support for multi-module assemblies isn't fully working yet; it is clear at this point that we want
to treat each module in a multi-module assembly separately for the purposes of the type system.
Siegfried Pammer
Christoph Wille
ElektroKill
dotnet format
Daniel Grunwald