Mark stack slot for aggressive removal in InfeasiblePathTransform

This helps with pattern matching in short circuiting operators.

ICSharpCode.Decompiler/CSharp/CSharpDecompiler.cs

@@ -97,10 +97,10 @@ namespace ICSharpCode.Decompiler.CSharp
 				new DetectExitPoints(),
 				new LdLocaDupInitObjTransform(),
 				new EarlyExpressionTransforms(),
+				new SplitVariables(), // split variables once again, because the stobj(ldloca V, ...) may open up new replacements
 				// RemoveDeadVariableInit must run after EarlyExpressionTransforms so that stobj(ldloca V, ...)
 				// is already collapsed into stloc(V, ...).
 				new RemoveDeadVariableInit(),
-				new SplitVariables(), // split variables once again, because the stobj(ldloca V, ...) may open up new replacements
 				new ControlFlowSimplification(), //split variables may enable new branch to leave inlining
 				new DynamicCallSiteTransform(),
 				new SwitchDetection(),

ICSharpCode.Decompiler/IL/ILVariable.cs

@@ -372,6 +372,11 @@ namespace ICSharpCode.Decompiler.IL
 		/// </summary>
 		public IField? StateMachineField;
 
+		/// <summary>
+		/// If enabled, remove dead stores to this variable as if the "Remove dead code" option is enabled.
+		/// </summary>
+		internal bool RemoveIfRedundant;
+
 		public ILVariable(VariableKind kind, IType type, int? index = null)
 		{
 			if (type == null)

ICSharpCode.Decompiler/IL/Transforms/RemoveDeadVariableInit.cs

@@ -42,41 +42,44 @@ namespace ICSharpCode.Decompiler.IL.Transforms
 			// This is necessary to remove useless stores generated by some compilers, e.g., the F# compiler.
 			// In yield return + async, the C# compiler tends to store null/default(T) to variables
 			// when the variable goes out of scope.
-			if (function.IsAsync || function.IsIterator || context.Settings.RemoveDeadStores)
+			bool removeDeadStores = function.IsAsync || function.IsIterator || context.Settings.RemoveDeadStores;
+
+			var variableQueue = new Queue<ILVariable>(function.Variables);
+			while (variableQueue.Count > 0)
 			{
-				var variableQueue = new Queue<ILVariable>(function.Variables);
-				while (variableQueue.Count > 0)
+				var v = variableQueue.Dequeue();
+				if (v.Kind != VariableKind.Local && v.Kind != VariableKind.StackSlot)
+					continue;
+				if (!(v.RemoveIfRedundant || removeDeadStores))
+					continue;
+				// Skip variables that are captured in a mcs yield state-machine
+				// loads of these will only be visible after DelegateConstruction step.
+				if (function.StateMachineCompiledWithMono && v.StateMachineField != null)
+					continue;
+				if (v.LoadCount != 0 || v.AddressCount != 0)
+					continue;
+				foreach (var stloc in v.StoreInstructions.OfType<StLoc>().ToArray())
 				{
-					var v = variableQueue.Dequeue();
-					if (v.Kind != VariableKind.Local && v.Kind != VariableKind.StackSlot)
-						continue;
-					// Skip variables that are captured in a mcs yield state-machine
-					// loads of these will only be visible after DelegateConstruction step.
-					if (function.StateMachineCompiledWithMono && v.StateMachineField != null)
-						continue;
-					if (v.LoadCount != 0 || v.AddressCount != 0)
-						continue;
-					foreach (var stloc in v.StoreInstructions.OfType<StLoc>().ToArray())
+					if (stloc.Parent is Block block)
 					{
-						if (stloc.Parent is Block block)
+						context.Step($"Dead store to {v.Name}", stloc);
+						if (SemanticHelper.IsPure(stloc.Value.Flags))
+						{
+							block.Instructions.Remove(stloc);
+						}
+						else
 						{
-							if (SemanticHelper.IsPure(stloc.Value.Flags))
-							{
-								block.Instructions.Remove(stloc);
-							}
-							else
-							{
-								stloc.ReplaceWith(stloc.Value);
-							}
-							if (stloc.Value is LdLoc ldloc)
-							{
-								variableQueue.Enqueue(ldloc.Variable);
-							}
+							stloc.ReplaceWith(stloc.Value);
+						}
+						if (stloc.Value is LdLoc ldloc)
+						{
+							variableQueue.Enqueue(ldloc.Variable);
 						}
 					}
 				}
 			}
 
+
 			// Try to infer IType of stack slots that are of StackType.Ref:
 			foreach (var v in function.Variables)
 			{

ICSharpCode.Decompiler/IL/Transforms/RemoveInfeasiblePathTransform.cs

@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ namespace ICSharpCode.Decompiler.IL.Transforms
 				return false;
 			context.Step("RemoveInfeasiblePath", br);
 			br.TargetBlock = targetBlock;
+			s.RemoveIfRedundant = true;
 			return true;
 		}
 

ICSharpCode.Decompiler/IL/Transforms/SplitVariables.cs

@@ -64,7 +64,8 @@ namespace ICSharpCode.Decompiler.IL.Transforms
 				case VariableKind.StackSlot:
 					// stack slots: are already split by construction,
 					// except for the locals-turned-stackslots in async functions
-					if (v.Function.IsAsync)
+					// or stack slots handled by the infeasible path transform
+					if (v.Function.IsAsync || v.RemoveIfRedundant)
 						goto case VariableKind.Local;
 					else
 						return false;
@@ -270,6 +271,7 @@ namespace ICSharpCode.Decompiler.IL.Transforms
 					v.HasGeneratedName = inst.Variable.HasGeneratedName;
 					v.StateMachineField = inst.Variable.StateMachineField;
 					v.HasInitialValue = false; // we'll set HasInitialValue when we encounter an uninit load
+					v.RemoveIfRedundant = inst.Variable.RemoveIfRedundant;
 					newVariables.Add(representative, v);
 					inst.Variable.Function.Variables.Add(v);
 				}