From b6cd1f3ccba8c7b87f6dd283e349fd068da0bde8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Siegfried Pammer <siegfriedpammer@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 21:48:46 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] Use correct annotation to detect custom operators.

---
 .../CSharp/Transforms/ReplaceMethodCallsWithOperators.cs        | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/ICSharpCode.Decompiler/CSharp/Transforms/ReplaceMethodCallsWithOperators.cs b/ICSharpCode.Decompiler/CSharp/Transforms/ReplaceMethodCallsWithOperators.cs
index 01628408a..fe75fc727 100644
--- a/ICSharpCode.Decompiler/CSharp/Transforms/ReplaceMethodCallsWithOperators.cs
+++ b/ICSharpCode.Decompiler/CSharp/Transforms/ReplaceMethodCallsWithOperators.cs
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ namespace ICSharpCode.Decompiler.CSharp.Transforms
 				// detect increment/decrement
 				if (assignment.Right.IsMatch(new PrimitiveExpression(1))) {
 					// only if it's not a custom operator
-					if (assignment.Annotation<MethodReference>() == null) {
+					if (assignment.Annotation<IL.CallInstruction>() == null) {
 						UnaryOperatorType type;
 						// When the parent is an expression statement, pre- or post-increment doesn't matter;
 						// so we can pick post-increment which is more commonly used (for (int i = 0; i < x; i++))