From 92f6c6f3e6643c52935b26d3f97cd6a1b4c82c7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Siegfried Pammer <siegfriedpammer@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2026 13:14:14 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add pretty tests for await in expression positions

await inside a null-coalescing expression, as a do-while condition,
on a ValueTask, and inside an interpolated-string hole (the
DefaultInterpolatedStringHandler lowering) were not covered.

Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5:Claude Code
---
 .../TestCases/Pretty/Async.cs                 | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)

diff --git a/ICSharpCode.Decompiler.Tests/TestCases/Pretty/Async.cs b/ICSharpCode.Decompiler.Tests/TestCases/Pretty/Async.cs
index f5d2e7a71..2c4e38545 100644
--- a/ICSharpCode.Decompiler.Tests/TestCases/Pretty/Async.cs
+++ b/ICSharpCode.Decompiler.Tests/TestCases/Pretty/Async.cs
@@ -583,6 +583,39 @@ namespace ICSharpCode.Decompiler.Tests.TestCases.Pretty
 			}
 		}
 #endif
+
+#if ROSLYN
+		// The legacy csc lowering of await inside the null-coalescing operator is not
+		// reconstructed; the raw awaiter state machine leaks into the output.
+		public static async Task<int> AwaitInCoalesce(Task<int?> t, Task<int> u)
+		{
+			return (await t) ?? (await u);
+		}
+#endif
+
+		public static async Task DoWhileAwaitCondition(Func<Task<bool>> t)
+		{
+			do
+			{
+				Console.WriteLine("body");
+			} while (await t());
+		}
+
+#if CS70 && !NET40
+		// The legacy csc and Roslyn 1.x configurations compile against the legacy
+		// .NET Framework reference assemblies, which have no ValueTask.
+		public static async Task<int> AwaitValueTask(ValueTask<int> t)
+		{
+			return await t + 1;
+		}
+#endif
+
+#if CS100 && !NET40
+		public static async Task<string> AwaitInInterpolationHole(Task<int> t)
+		{
+			return $"val={await t,5:x} end";
+		}
+#endif
 	}
 
 	public struct AsyncInStruct